Are the Zone VI meter modifications worth it?

Amongst large format photographers, the Pentax Digital Spotmeter is ubiquitoous. It's small size, relatively light weight, accuracy, and reliability have made it a standout choice for field photographers for years and years.

Back when Zone VI was still in business (before it got bought out by Calumet), Zone VI sold a modified Pentax meter; they claimed that the modifications included replacing the light sensor, adding a filter pack to adjust the spectral sensitivity of the meter to match that of film, and adding baffling to reduce the sensitivity of the meter to flare.

Calumet still sells the modified meter, and Richard Ritter (see http://www.lg4mat.net/) still makes the modifications to Pentax and Soligor meters.

The claims for the modifications are:

True one degree spot metering

reduced flare

'ultrablack' coating eliminates reflections

filter packs match spectral response to film (specifically Tri-X) so that metering through filters is accurate

superior photo-cell and calibration improve linearity and accuracy.

Calumet have an article written by Alan Ross discussing the modifications on their web site here. In the article Alan discussing metering through filters, and describes a test where film is exposed according the meter readings (with the meter readings made through filters, or metering color patches) and then developed to demonstrate any differences between meter sensitivity and film sensitivity.

For years, I've owned a Zone VI modified Pentax meter - I called up Zone VI on the phone, and actually had a nice conversation with Fred Picker when I ordered the meter.

Recently, I bought a used unmodified Pentax meter when a friend was getting rid of his large format gear. Having a backup meter made sense and the price was right.

Then I realized that I actually possessed both a modified and unmodified meter, and I could actually test them against one another (and against my Sekonic L-508) to see if the modifications actually made any difference.

(please see also zone VI reprise.htm, where I examine various literature and counterclaims)

Spectral sensitivity testing

The first thing I decided was that I would NOT test the claim that the Zone VI modified meter matched the spectral response of Tri-X. First, I don't use Tri-X, and second, my real questions were "Are the results of metering with the Zone VI modified meter and the unmodified meter actually different, and if so, under what conditions are they different?

Beyond answering those two questions, I wanted my experiment to be repeatable and reproducible - that is, I wanted to be able to perform the same experiment again to see if my results were repeatable, and I wanted to use only equipment likely to be found in the toolkit of other photographers, so that other photographers could see if they could reproduce my results.

That said, here's my experiment: I would meter various test targets of various colors, under various lighting conditions, both without filters and through filters, and see if I could detect any difference between the readings given by one meter versus those given by another. If there's no difference in the meter readings, then I conclude that the modifications have no meaningful effect. If there's a difference, I can look at the situations where the meters produce different readings, and see if there are patterns to when the meter readings differ.

Macbeth Color Checker

For test targets, I decided to use a standard for colors, the Macbeth Color Checker(tm). Everyone knows what the colors are in the Color Checker, each Color Checker should match all the others, and photographers commonly own them, which makes it easy for other people to reproduce my experimental equipment.

My plan was to meter all 24 color patches of the Color Checker, in several different lighting conditions, without and thru filters, and record the meter readings for each meter. Then I can compare the readings and assess the differences, if any are found.

I metered each color patch from a distance of about 2 feet, metering the center of the patch. Each meter reading was recorded. Every few readings, I would meter the first patch again, to ensure that I'd spot any changes in illumination. Meter readings which oscillated back and forth between two readings (e.g. between 10 1/3 and 10 2/3) were recorded as being midway between the two readings (e.g. 10 3/6). All the meters had fresh batteries inserted just prior to starting the tests.

Finally, I tested the meters' sensitivity to flare by setting up a flare prone metering situation and comparing meter readings. The test setup was a white sheet of matboard, illuminated from the front, with a 2" hole cut in it. A sheet of flat black material was draped about 2 feet behind this card, with the light source placed so that the light passing through the hole fell on the material outside the line of sight through the hole. I then metered the dark surface through the hole.

Direct Sun, no filters

The first setup was having the Macbeth Color Checker in direct midafternoon sun (my location is near Carnation, WA, east of Seattle).

The data for this setup are:

patch Zone VI Pentax Sekonic Pentax 'error' Sekonic 'Error"

dark skin 14.33 14.33 14.60 0.00 0.27

light skin 16.17 16.00 16.40 -0.17 0.23

blue sky 15.67 15.33 15.60 -0.33 -0.07

foliage 14.67 14.67 14.70 0.00 0.03

blue flower 16.00 15.83 16.00 -0.17 0.00

bluish green 16.33 16.33 16.40 0.00 0.07

orange 15.67 15.83 16.00 0.17 0.33

purplish blue 15.33 15.00 15.40 -0.33 0.07

moderate red 15.33 15.33 15.70 0.00 0.37

purple 14.33 14.33 14.50 0.00 0.17

yellow green 16.00 16.00 16.10 0.00 0.10

orange yellow 16.00 16.00 16.20 0.00 0.20

blue 14.67 14.67 14.70 0.00 0.03

green 15.33 15.33 15.40 0.00 0.07

red 15.00 15.00 15.30 0.00 0.30

yellow green 16.33 16.33 16.60 0.00 0.27

magenta 15.67 15.67 15.90 0.00 0.23

cyan 15.67 15.33 15.50 -0.33 -0.17

white (.05) 17.33 17.33 17.60 0.00 0.27

Neutral 8 (.23) 16.67 16.67 16.90 0.00 0.23

Neutral 6.5 (.44) 16.17 16.00 16.20 -0.17 0.03

Neutral 5 (.70) 15.33 15.00 15.20 -0.33 -0.13

Neutral 3.5 (1.05) 14.33 14.00 14.20 -0.33 -0.13

Black (1.50) 13.00 12.67 12.70 -0.33 -0.30

The patch titles are those given on the back of the Macbeth Color Checker. The numbers are the meter reading on the Zone VI and Pentax meters, and the value given by the Sekonic L-508 meter with the film speed set to 100. The columns labeled 'Pentax Error' and 'Sekonic Error' are the readings given by the unmodified Pentax (and Sekonic, respectively) with the readings given by the Zone VI modified meter subtracted.

Some interesting observations - the unmodified Pentax meter reads .1 stop lower than the Zone VI modified meter on average, and that the Sekonic L-508 reads 0.14 stop higher. In no case in this setup does the deviation between meters exceed 1/3 stop.

A better assessment of the difference between meters might be the RMS difference between the readings; for the Zone VI and unmodified Pentax meter in this setup, the RMS difference is 0.18, for the Zone VI and the Sekonic, the RMS difference in this setup is 0.28.

Open Shade, no filters

The next setup was with the Macbeth Color Checker set in open shade. The data are:

Patch Zone VI Pentax Sekonic Pentax 'error' Sekonic 'Error"

dark skin 10.00 10.00 10.30 0.00 0.30

light skin 11.67 11.33 12.10 -0.33 0.43

blue sky 11.00 10.83 11.40 -0.17 0.40

foliage 9.67 9.83 10.30 0.17 0.63

blue flower 11.00 11.00 11.70 0.00 0.70

bluish green 11.33 11.33 12.00 0.00 0.67

orange 11.17 11.00 11.70 -0.17 0.53

purplish blue 11.00 10.67 11.30 -0.33 0.30

moderate red 10.67 10.83 11.40 0.17 0.73

purple 9.67 10.00 10.30 0.33 0.63

yellow green 11.17 11.00 11.70 -0.17 0.53

orange yellow 11.00 11.00 11.80 0.00 0.80

blue 10.33 10.00 10.80 -0.33 0.47

green 10.67 10.67 11.20 0.00 0.53

red 10.33 10.67 11.10 0.33 0.77

yellow green 11.67 11.67 12.30 0.00 0.63

magenta 11.00 11.00 11.70 0.00 0.70

cyan 10.67 10.67 11.30 0.00 0.63

white (.05) 13.00 12.67 13.50 -0.33 0.50

Neutral 8 (.23) 12.50 12.33 12.90 -0.17 0.40

Neutral 6.5 (.44) 12.00 11.67 12.20 -0.33 0.20

Neutral 5 (.70) 11.00 10.67 11.20 -0.33 0.20

Neutral 3.5 (1.05) 10.00 9.67 10.10 -0.33 0.10

Black (1.50) 8.67 8.67 8.70 0.00 0.03

In this case, on average the unmodified Pentax meter read 0.13 stop lower than the Zone VI modified meter, and the Sekonic read 0.49 stop higher. The maximum difference between the Pentax and Zone VI modified meter was 1/3 stop, the maximum difference between the Sekonic and the Zone VI was 0.8 stop.

The RMS difference between the Zone VI and the unmodified Pentax was 0.22, between the Zone VI and the Sekonic 0.54.

Direct Sun, B+W 090 (red) filter

The next setup was with the Macbeth Color Checker set in direct sun, but metering through a B+W 090 (red) filter.

Patch Zone VI Pentax Sekonic Pentax 'error' Sekonic 'Error"

dark skin 12.33 12.67 13.30 0.33 0.97

light skin 14.33 14.33 15.00 0.00 0.67

blue sky 12.67 12.67 13.10 0.00 0.43

foliage 12.33 12.33 12.60 0.00 0.27

blue flower 13.33

Introduction

Spectral sensitivity testing

Direct Sun, no filters

Open Shade, no filters

Direct Sun, B+W 090 (red) filter